Imam Luqman Ahmad Mosque Without Borders

Understanding  Bid’ah (innovation) According to Sharia.
The superfluous use, misuse and overuse of the word ‘bid’ah’ (innovation) by Muslims, especially in the American Muslim convert community, has taken a toll on the community often with unintended and in many cases, undesirable consequences.
Bid’ah is one of the most overused, and at the same time, most misunderstood terminology in the urban parlance of Islam. It has gotten so bad that people disparagingly speak of ‘bid’ah police. People who lack understanding of sharia law will assail an action as Bid’ah while being totally oblivious to the actual sharia law view on the matter.
Many others have become desensitized to the word so much so that legitimate use of the term falls on deaf ears in cases where it actually matters. Reckless and capricious use of the terminology without knowledge falls into the category of haram.
The classification of bid’ah (innovation) into five categories is a well-known framework in Islam that is known by scholars. This classification of the term represents as major scholarly perspective, however not a unanimous opinion. This view allows for a more nuanced understanding of new matters considering Islamic (sharia) law.

The five categories of Bid’ah and some of their examples as detailed by scholars who support this classification, most notably Imam Al-Izz ibn Abdus-Salam  are explained below.

Category Definition Practical Examples
Obligatory (Wajib) Some Innovations that are necessary to preserve the religion and must be established within the community as a legal necessity (ضرورة شرعيةة) such as studying Arabic grammar to correctly understand the Quran and Sunnah,  Compiling the Quran into a single book and later into Uthmanic codices, and documenting and verifying Hadith to distinguish authentic from weak narrations. All of the above are innovations in the practice of the religion of Islam. Yet, all of the above are vital in preserving the religion and its authenticity.
Prohibited (Haram) Beliefs or practices that directly contradict the established principles of Islam . – Introducing heretical doctrines like those of the Jahmiyyah (who denied Allah’s attributes) or Qadariyyah (who denied divine decree) . Or the belief of the people who say that they follow the Quran only and don’t follow hadith. Or the practice of changing the Quran’s words or reciting it in a way that distorts its meaning .
Recommended (Mandoob)
New, good practices that are in harmony with the spirit of Sharia and bring benefit to the community such as building Islamic schools, and libraries to facilitate religious education. Establishing the second Adhan for Friday prayers aa the Salaf did during Uthman’s caliphate due to the growing population of Muslims. The Caliph Umar ibn al-Khattaab during his caliphate gathered the multifarious groups praying tarawih into a single congregation. Ubay ibn Kaʿb said: ‘This was not done before ” Sayyidina ʿUmar said “I am fully aware of this, but it is excellent ” He also said: ‘What a fine innovation (bid’ah) this is.”
Disliked (Makruh)
Innovations that are not sinful but are discouraged, often involving excessiveness .  Like excessively decorating mosques with ornate calligraphy or gold, which may distract worshippers. – Ornamenting copies of the Quran in an extravagant manner whoch both are all considered disliked by many scholars of Islam.
Permissible (Mubah) New practices in daily life that the law (sharia) is indifferent towards, as they do not resemble acts of worship . – Enjoying a variety of good foods, drinks, and fine clothing . – Using new technologies (like virtual learning, microphones for the Adhan) to serve the religion.
The Scholarly Basis for This View
Proponents of this five-fold classification, which includes many Shafi’ee scholars like Imam Al-Nawawi and Imam Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani, and other scholars like Ibn Rajab al-Hanbali argue that it is a practical necessity. They base their reasoning on several key points:
Imam Al-‘Izz ibn ‘Abdus-Salam, a Shaafi’ee scholar who reached the level of Muj’tahid is the one most famously associated with the five-fold classification of bid’ah. He is a pivotal figure in this topic because he provided the systematic framework that many later scholars adopted. His perspective on bid’ah is nuanced and built on a critical distinction between linguistic and legal definitions. Here is a detailed explanation of what he said, supported by proofs from his methodology.

The Core Principle: Linguistic vs. Legal Definition

Imam Al-‘Izz ibn ‘Abdus-Salam’s entire framework rests on the idea that the term “Bid’ah” (innovation) has two distinct meanings:

1. The Linguistic Definition of Bid’ah (Lughatan): In the Arabic language, Bid’ah simply means anything new, novel, or unprecedented. In this sense, the word is neutral and carries no inherent religious judgment (good or bad).
2. The Legal Definition of Bid’ah (Sharan): In the context of Islamic law, Bid’ah refers specifically to innovations in matters of religion and worship (Ibadat) that were not practiced by the Prophet ﷺ or his Companions. He argued that in this legal context, all Bid’ah are blameworthy.

This distinction is crucial. When Caliph `Umar (RA) gathered people for Tarawih prayer and called it a “excellent Bid’ah,” he was using the word in its linguistic sense—meaning a new practice that is good and in perfect harmony with the Sunnah. Also, after the battle of Yamaamah, when many of the reciters Quran were killed in battle, Umar ibn al-Khattaab presented to Abu Bar as-Siddeeq who was Khalifa at the time, the idea to write the Quran down in one book, something that the Prophet did not do. Abu Bakr immediately said it was bid’ah.  Umar called it a good bid’ah and persisted in trying to convince the Khalif Abu Bakr until Abu Bakr finally agreed with him. The rest is history. This is an example of a good Bid’ah.

The Principle of Categorization (Ahkam) of actions fall into five categories according to Islamic law and are part of the sharia of Islam upon which scholars agree.  Every fiqh book in print as all five of these categories of ruling. Scholars apply the five legal rulings (obligatory, recommended, etc.) to all human actions. Since new innovations are human actions, they logically fall under these same rulings according to the view of many scholars.

Acts of the Companions: They point to other actions by the Prophet’s Companions that had no exact precedent, such as Caliph Uthman adding a second call to prayer for Jumu’ah. Since this was done to solve a new problem and was accepted by the community, it is also seen as a “good” innovation.

General Welfare (Maslaha): This view holds that innovations serving a clear public good and not contradicting any text are acceptable and can even be obligatory if the community’s religious interests depend on them. Such as when after the Muslims conquered Persia during the time when Umar was the Khalifa. The diwan established by Caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab (around 634–644 CE). The Diwan (a Persian word, and a practice of Persians (who were mushrikeen) was a sophisticated bureaucratic system, specifically a register or treasury department. It was created to manage the vast wealth and state finances of the rapidly expanding Islamic empire. Yet it was indeed a bid’ah and something not established by the Prophet.

The Other Major Perspective: All Innovation is Misguidance

It is equally important to present the other major scholarly view, which challenges the very idea of categorizing bid’ah into “good” and “bad” type. Many scholars, particularly from the Maliki and Hanbali schools, argue that the classification above mixes linguistic bid’ah (new things in general) with religious bid’ah (innovation in matters of faith) .
Ibn Rajab, who was a renowned Hanbali scholar whose definition of religious innovation was strict. He stated that bid’ah is “any form of worship which has no basis in the Sharia which would warrant its legislation”. He further clarified that any practice which does have a basis in the sacred texts is not a religious innovation, even if it’s new in the linguistic sense.

Imam Ash-Shatibi, a distinguished scholar of the Maliki school, thoroughly opposed the five-category classification. He maintained that any action supported by evidence (daleel) rendering it obligatory or recommended cannot be considered an innovation (Bid’ah). Rather, such an act should be regarded as Sunnah.

Textual Evidence: This perspective relies on the absolute nature of Prophetic traditions, such as: “Beware of newly invented matters, for every invented matter is an innovation, every innovation is misguidance, and every misguidance is in the Fire” .
Scholars who hold this view also use the Principle of Perfection: They cite the Quranic verse: “This day I have perfected for you your religion and completed My favor upon you and have approved for you Islam as a religion…” (Quran 5:3). They argue that since the religion of Islam is perfect and complete, there is no need to introduce new forms of worship.

How to Understand the Difference

The key to reconciling these views is to distinguish between new matters in worldly affairs versus new matters in worship (`Ibadat) and understanding the nuance and specificity between them.

Worldly Matters: The default ruling for any worldly matter is permissibility (Ibaha) according to Islamic law unless there is daleel (proof) to the contrary. Using a microphone for the adhan or building schools is a new worldly matter as well as an innovation in religious practice that helps fulfill a religious command, (learning or practicing the religion). Learning the religion is incumbent upon every Muslim based on the hadith, “seeing knowledge is incumbent upon every Muslim”, and by agreement of all Muslim scholars since no scholar hold the view that learning one’s religion is other than incumbent. Building schools is an innovation as the Prophet didn’t build any schools, but most scholars agree that doing so is permissible and even good, because building schools, although technically a bid’ah fulfills the general pursuit of religious knowledge, which is an incumbent act (wajib)

Acts of Worship: The default ruling is prohibited (Tawqeef). For example, you cannot invent a new prayer, a new fasting period, or a new way of performing Hajj that the Prophet ﷺ did not teach. Any innovation in this specific category would be considered a blameworthy bid’ah.

In summary, the debate centers on terminology. The five-category classification is a comprehensive framework for dealing with all new situations. The stricter view, which states all religious innovation is misguidance, acts as a powerful shield to protect the core acts of worship from being altered or corrupted. And Allah knows best.

Imam Abu Laith Luqman Ahmad

Imamabulaith@yahoo.com